Abstract
With spectroscopic methods, e.g. near infrared (NIR) analysis, using a constant beam aperture, the effective scanning footprint will be different for a spinning Petri dish, a rolling bottle and a new spiral sampler configuration. This will significantly influence the analytical accuracy and precision of a NIR analytical determination of heterogeneous materials, for example barley with differing protein contents. Here we present the results from a bench-top experiment that evaluates the total analytical bias and precision characteristics for three alternative sample presentation approaches using a mixture of two plastic polymer pellets as a test material with significant heterogeneity. After removal of all incorrect sampling errors (ICS), there are still significantly varying correct sampling error [Fundamental Sampling Error (FSE) and Grouping and Segregation Error (GSE)] uncertainties associated with these standard analytical approaches–but there is a clear winner.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 11-15 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | NIR News |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2014 |
Programme Area
- Programme Area 3: Energy Resources
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Visualisation of sampling error effects in near infrared analysis - comparison betwen Petri dish, roll bottle and spiral sampler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver