TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance
AU - Refsgaard, Jens Christian
AU - van der Sluijs, Jeroen P.
AU - Højberg, Anker Lajer
AU - Vanrolleghem, Peter A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The present work was carried out within the Concerted Action Harmoni-CA, which is partly funded under EC's 5th Framework Research Programme (Contract EVK1-CT2001-00192). A previous, and much longer, version of the work can be found in a report ( Refsgaard et al., 2005b ) which emerged after formal external reviews and discussions at a CATCHMOD Technical Workshop, Copenhagen 16.11.2004. The constructive comments of two anonymous reviewers are acknowledged.
PY - 2007/11
Y1 - 2007/11
N2 - A terminology and typology of uncertainty is presented together with a framework for the modelling process, its interaction with the broader water management process and the role of uncertainty at different stages in the modelling processes. Brief reviews have been made of 14 different (partly complementary) methods commonly used in uncertainty assessment and characterisation: data uncertainty engine (DUE), error propagation equations, expert elicitation, extended peer review, inverse modelling (parameter estimation), inverse modelling (predictive uncertainty), Monte Carlo analysis, multiple model simulation, NUSAP, quality assurance, scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, stakeholder involvement and uncertainty matrix. The applicability of these methods has been mapped according to purpose of application, stage of the modelling process and source and type of uncertainty addressed. It is concluded that uncertainty assessment is not just something to be added after the completion of the modelling work. Instead uncertainty should be seen as a red thread throughout the modelling study starting from the very beginning, where the identification and characterisation of all uncertainty sources should be performed jointly by the modeller, the water manager and the stakeholders.
AB - A terminology and typology of uncertainty is presented together with a framework for the modelling process, its interaction with the broader water management process and the role of uncertainty at different stages in the modelling processes. Brief reviews have been made of 14 different (partly complementary) methods commonly used in uncertainty assessment and characterisation: data uncertainty engine (DUE), error propagation equations, expert elicitation, extended peer review, inverse modelling (parameter estimation), inverse modelling (predictive uncertainty), Monte Carlo analysis, multiple model simulation, NUSAP, quality assurance, scenario analysis, sensitivity analysis, stakeholder involvement and uncertainty matrix. The applicability of these methods has been mapped according to purpose of application, stage of the modelling process and source and type of uncertainty addressed. It is concluded that uncertainty assessment is not just something to be added after the completion of the modelling work. Instead uncertainty should be seen as a red thread throughout the modelling study starting from the very beginning, where the identification and characterisation of all uncertainty sources should be performed jointly by the modeller, the water manager and the stakeholders.
KW - Catchment modelling
KW - Integrated water resources management
KW - Uncertainty
KW - Water framework directive
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250709596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004
M3 - Article
VL - 22
SP - 1543
EP - 1556
JO - Environmental Modelling & Software
JF - Environmental Modelling & Software
IS - 11
ER -