The integrated hydrologic model intercomparison project, IH-MIP2: A second set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks

Stefan Kollet, Mauro Sulis, Reed M. Maxwell, Claudio Paniconi, Mario Putti, Giacomo Bertoldi, Ethan T. Coon, Emanuele Cordano, Stefano Endrizzi, Evgeny Kikinzon, Emmanuel Mouche, Claude Mügler, Young-Jin Park, Jens C. Refsgaard, Simon Stisen, Edward Sudicky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

114 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emphasizing the physical intricacies of integrated hydrology and feedbacks in simulating connected, variably saturated groundwater-surface water systems, the Integrated Hydrologic Model Intercomparison Project initiated a second phase (IH-MIP2), increasing the complexity of the benchmarks of the first phase. The models that took part in the intercomparison were ATS, Cast3M, CATHY, GEOtop, HydroGeoSphere, MIKE-SHE, and ParFlow. IH-MIP2 benchmarks included a tilted v-catchment with 3-D subsurface; a superslab case expanding the slab case of the first phase with an additional horizontal subsurface heterogeneity; and the Borden field rainfall-runoff experiment. The analyses encompassed time series of saturated, unsaturated, and ponded storages, as well as discharge. Vertical cross sections and profiles were also inspected in the superslab and Borden benchmarks. An analysis of agreement was performed including systematic and unsystematic deviations between the different models. Results show generally good agreement between the different models, which lends confidence in the fundamental physical and numerical implementation of the governing equations in the different models. Differences can be attributed to the varying level of detail in the mathematical and numerical representation or in the parameterization of physical processes, in particular with regard to ponded storage and friction slope in the calculation of overland flow. These differences may become important for specific applications such as detailed inundation modeling or when strong inhomogeneities are present in the simulation domain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-890
Number of pages24
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • benchmarks
  • integrated models
  • intercomparison

Programme Area

  • Programme Area 2: Water Resources

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The integrated hydrologic model intercomparison project, IH-MIP2: A second set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this