Size differences of Arctic marine protists between two climate periods-using the paleoecological record to assess the importance of within-species trait variation

Erik A. Mousing, Sofia Ribeiro, Chelsea Chisholm, Antoon Kuijpers, Matthias Moros, Marianne Ellegaard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mean body size decreases with increasing temperature in a variety of organisms. This size–temperature relationship has generally been tested through space but rarely through time. We analyzed the sedimentary archive of dinoflagellate cysts in a sediment record taken from the West Greenland shelf and show that mean cell size decreased at both intra- and interspecific scales in a period of relatively warm temperatures, compared with a period of relatively cold temperatures. We further show that intraspecific changes accounted for more than 70% of the change in community mean size, whereas shifts in species composition only accounted for about 30% of the observed change. Literature values on size ranges and midpoints for individual taxa were in several cases not representative for the measured sizes, although changes in community mean size, calculated from literature values, did capture the direction of change. While the results show that intraspecific variation is necessary to accurately estimate the magnitude of change in protist community mean size, it may be possible to investigate general patterns, that is relative size differences, using interspecific-level estimates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-13
Number of pages11
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • cell size
  • dinoflagellate cysts
  • interspecific
  • intraspecific
  • paleoecology
  • temperature

Programme Area

  • Programme Area 5: Nature and Climate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Size differences of Arctic marine protists between two climate periods-using the paleoecological record to assess the importance of within-species trait variation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this