Abstract
A prospective environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) and financial cost assessment is performed to the application of bioaugmentation to sand filters in Danish waterworks, to remove 2,6- dichlorobenzamide (BAM) from drinking water resources. Based on pilot-scale and laboratory-scale data, we compare bioaugmentation to current alternative strategies, namely granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption, and well re-location. Both assessments identified well re-location as the least preferred option, however, this result is very sensitive to the distance from the waterworks to the new well. When bioaugmentation is compared to GAC, the former has a lower impact in 13 impact categories, but if immobilized bacteria are used, the impacts are higher than for GAC in all impact categories. On the other hand, from a cost perspective bioaugmentation appears to be preferable to GAC only if immobilized bacteria are used.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1405-1413 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Water Supply |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- 2,6-dichlorobenzamide (BAM)
- Bioaugmentation
- Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
- Drinking water
- Life cycle assessment (LCA)
Programme Area
- Programme Area 2: Water Resources
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective environmental and economic assessment for biotreatment of micropollutants in drinking water resources in Denmark'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver