Physically-based modelling, good modelling practice including uncertainty - reply to comment by Ewen et al. (2012)

Jens Christian Refsgaard; Børge Storm; Thomas Clausen

doi:10.2166/nh.2012.001

Physically-based modelling, good modelling practice including uncertainty - reply to comment by Ewen et al. (2012)

Jens Christian Refsgaard, Børge Storm, Thomas Clausen

Department of Hydrology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As stated explicitly in the paper by Refsgaard et al. ('Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based modelling', published in Hydrology Research 41 (5), 355-377), our paper was 'confined to a historical analysis based on our own experience through our work at DHI and, to a minor extent, the initiatives and work by DHI's ASHE partners'. We therefore welcome the comments by Ewen et al. (in this issue's Comment paper, pp. 945-947) hereafter referred to as EOBBKPO, with the views of another ASHE partner. This provides us with the opportunity to state our views even more clearly.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	948-950
Number of pages	3
Journal	Hydrology Research
Volume	43
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2012.001
Publication status	Published - Dec 2012

Keywords

Distributed hydrological model
MIKE SHE
Physically-based
SHE
SHETRAN
Uncertainty

Programme Area

Programme Area 2: Water Resources

Access to Document

10.2166/nh.2012.001Licence: Other

Cite this

@article{a596ad60cf1b403596dac2ba4bfcd130,

title = "Physically-based modelling, good modelling practice including uncertainty - reply to comment by Ewen et al. (2012)",

abstract = "As stated explicitly in the paper by Refsgaard et al. ('Syst{\`e}me Hydrologique Europe{\'e}n (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based modelling', published in Hydrology Research 41 (5), 355-377), our paper was 'confined to a historical analysis based on our own experience through our work at DHI and, to a minor extent, the initiatives and work by DHI's ASHE partners'. We therefore welcome the comments by Ewen et al. (in this issue's Comment paper, pp. 945-947) hereafter referred to as EOBBKPO, with the views of another ASHE partner. This provides us with the opportunity to state our views even more clearly.",

keywords = "Distributed hydrological model, MIKE SHE, Physically-based, SHE, SHETRAN, Uncertainty",

author = "Refsgaard, {Jens Christian} and B{\o}rge Storm and Thomas Clausen",

year = "2012",

month = dec,

doi = "10.2166/nh.2012.001",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "948--950",

journal = "Hydrology Research",

issn = "0029-1277",

publisher = "Nordic Association for Hydrology",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physically-based modelling, good modelling practice including uncertainty - reply to comment by Ewen et al. (2012)

AU - Refsgaard, Jens Christian

AU - Storm, Børge

AU - Clausen, Thomas

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - As stated explicitly in the paper by Refsgaard et al. ('Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based modelling', published in Hydrology Research 41 (5), 355-377), our paper was 'confined to a historical analysis based on our own experience through our work at DHI and, to a minor extent, the initiatives and work by DHI's ASHE partners'. We therefore welcome the comments by Ewen et al. (in this issue's Comment paper, pp. 945-947) hereafter referred to as EOBBKPO, with the views of another ASHE partner. This provides us with the opportunity to state our views even more clearly.

AB - As stated explicitly in the paper by Refsgaard et al. ('Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based modelling', published in Hydrology Research 41 (5), 355-377), our paper was 'confined to a historical analysis based on our own experience through our work at DHI and, to a minor extent, the initiatives and work by DHI's ASHE partners'. We therefore welcome the comments by Ewen et al. (in this issue's Comment paper, pp. 945-947) hereafter referred to as EOBBKPO, with the views of another ASHE partner. This provides us with the opportunity to state our views even more clearly.

KW - Distributed hydrological model

KW - MIKE SHE

KW - Physically-based

KW - SHE

KW - SHETRAN

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871367867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2166/nh.2012.001

DO - 10.2166/nh.2012.001

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0029-1277

VL - 43

SP - 948

EP - 950

JO - Hydrology Research

JF - Hydrology Research

IS - 6

ER -

Physically-based modelling, good modelling practice including uncertainty - reply to comment by Ewen et al. (2012)

Abstract

Keywords

Programme Area

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this