Marine influence in Amazonia: Evidence from the geological record

Jussi Hovikoski, Frank P. Wesselingh, Matti Räsänen, M. Gingras, Hubert B. Vonhof

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in bookResearchpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marine influence in Amazonia during the Miocene is a controversial issue, one about which nearly opposite theories (continental vs marine) have been proposed. Increasing multidisciplinary palaeoenvironmental data sets from various Miocene stratigraphic levels and parts of Amazonia have revealed depositional complexities triggered by repeated, high-frequency base-level changes and a very low depositional gradient. As a result, Early-Middle Miocene strata (Pebas phase) are organized into recurring 3-10 m-thick transgressive-regressive bay-margin successions. An array of evidence indicates some sort of marine influence in these deposits. This evidence includes mangrove pollen, foraminifers, rare brackish-water mollusc species, barnacles, common brackish-water trace fossil assemblages and tidal sediments. The ongoing debate now focuses on the degree of saltwater influence in the Pebas phase strata. The Late Miocene (Acre phase) stratigraphic record comprises mainly channelized deposits, and fossil faunas are dominated by terrestrial and freshwater vertebrates. The evidence for marginal marine influence in these strata is mainly confined to inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS)-bearing channels and includes tidal sediments, restricted brackish-water ichnofossil assemblages, and locally teeth of euryhaline sharks and mangrove pollen (Nauta and Madre de Dios Formations). In particular, the tidal signature in these deposits is well developed, pointing to local development of deltaic/estuarine settings. There are also suggestions of marine influence on other stratigraphic intervals throughout Amazonia, particularly in Pliocene and Quaternary strata. The allegedly marine conditions have been proposed based on purported global sea-level highstands, the low altitude of the Amazon region and supposed coastal geomorphological features such as deltas. We conclude that these suggestions are misconceptions and that geological data to support such marine settings during the Late Neogene are lacking.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAmazonia: landscape and species evolution
Subtitle of host publicationA look into the past
EditorsC. Hoorn, F.P. Wesselingh
PublisherWiley
Chapter9
Pages143-161
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-444-30640-8
ISBN (Print)978-1-405-18113-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Eustasy and geomorphology
  • Ichnological indications for marine influence
  • Invertebrate palaeosalinity indicators
  • Isotope geochemical methods assessing palaeosalinities
  • Marine influence in Amazonia - evidence from geological record
  • Marine influence in Amazonia in Miocene - controversial issues
  • Marine influence in Miocene western and western-central Amazonia
  • Sedimentological indications of marine influence
  • Tectonic subsidence of Andean foreland in Middle-Late Miocene - auto- and allocyclically driven shifts in depositional settings
  • Tidal cycle ideal superimposition - in semi-diurnal, coastal depositional settings

Programme Area

  • Programme Area 3: Energy Resources

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marine influence in Amazonia: Evidence from the geological record'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this