TY - JOUR
T1 - Geological assessment for CO2 storage in the Bahaiwan Basin, East China
AU - Poulsen, N.E.
AU - Chen, W.
AU - Dai, S.
AU - Ding, G.
AU - Li, M.
AU - Vincent, C.J.
AU - Zeng, R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Figure 1 Map of the study area in eastern China showing CO2 potential storage sites. Based on data from the Energy, Environment and Economy Research Institute, Tsinghua University; Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences; China University of Mining and Technology; Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina and the China University of Petroleum (CUP). The outline of the S hengli oilfield complex is from ‘Energy Map of China 2008’, © The Petroleum Economist Ltd, London. © British Geological Survey. British Geological Survey produced the GIS map.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The storage potential of selected sites within the Bahaiwan Basin was evaluated, the storage capacity estimated and the selection criteria considered for the COACH project. This paper examines the two methods used during the project for calculation of the storage capacity in the Shengli oilfield complex within the Bahaiwan Basin. Both methodologies were used to quantify the potential CO2 storage capacity of the depleted oil hydrocarbon reservoirs of the Shengli oilfield complex. They can both be considered as "simple" equation models which try to capture an " approximation" of a possible storage capacity. Nevertheless, between these models several differences exist. The CSLF methodology works with replacement of oil, gas or formation water, but does not incorporate dissolution of CO2 in formation water. The EOR methodology of CUPB developed from methodology of Tanaka et al. on the other hand includes dissolution of CO2 into the formation water, but does not consider the time period needed for the dissolution.
AB - The storage potential of selected sites within the Bahaiwan Basin was evaluated, the storage capacity estimated and the selection criteria considered for the COACH project. This paper examines the two methods used during the project for calculation of the storage capacity in the Shengli oilfield complex within the Bahaiwan Basin. Both methodologies were used to quantify the potential CO2 storage capacity of the depleted oil hydrocarbon reservoirs of the Shengli oilfield complex. They can both be considered as "simple" equation models which try to capture an " approximation" of a possible storage capacity. Nevertheless, between these models several differences exist. The CSLF methodology works with replacement of oil, gas or formation water, but does not incorporate dissolution of CO2 in formation water. The EOR methodology of CUPB developed from methodology of Tanaka et al. on the other hand includes dissolution of CO2 into the formation water, but does not consider the time period needed for the dissolution.
KW - Bahaiwan (Bohai) basin
KW - CCS
KW - China
KW - Cslf methodology
KW - CUPB
KW - Eor methodology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955390382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.602
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.602
M3 - Conference article in journal
AN - SCOPUS:79955390382
SN - 1876-6102
VL - 4
SP - 5990
EP - 5998
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
T2 - 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies
Y2 - 19 September 2010 through 23 September 2010
ER -