Distinguishing fluvio-deltaic facies by bulk geochemistry and heavy minerals: An example from the miocene of Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


Interpretations of seismic profiles, gamma-ray logs and sediment descriptions were used to classify seven facies in Miocene fluvio-deltaic deposits of Denmark. An impartial approach was adopted by not including analytical data in the facies definition. This approach allowed identification of significant differences between facies, where each fluvio-deltaic facies can be distinguished by integrating geochemistry and mineralogy through a sedimentary succession. Variations in the heavy mineral assemblage between facies are caused primarily by sorting of hydraulically equivalent grains. Decreasing grain size of quartz and heavy minerals from the channel facies towards the delta shoreface facies and further along the coast to the spit shoreface facies is associated with an increase in sorting and textural maturity. This trend is related to longshore drift. Increasing heavy mineral grain size is found from the delta slope facies offshore to the delta toe and shelf facies. This trend is interpreted as a result of sorting by turbidity currents. The mixed origin of the transgressive lag facies is shown by the poorer sorting in this facies. By indicating the amount of alteration the sediments have been exposed to, the Ti-mineral maturity has proven useful in characterizing the facies. This systematic approach of tying depositional environments to a well-calibrated sequence stratigraphic model has generated analytical results which are valid as reference levels for future facies identifications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1155-1179
Number of pages25
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011


  • Denmark
  • Elemental geochemistry
  • Fluvio-deltaic facies
  • Heavy mineral distribution
  • Miocene
  • Turbidite sorting

Programme Area

  • Programme Area 3: Energy Resources


Dive into the research topics of 'Distinguishing fluvio-deltaic facies by bulk geochemistry and heavy minerals: An example from the miocene of Denmark'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this