Abstract
This paper assesses how various sources of uncertainty propagate through the uncertainty cascade from emission scenarios through climate models and hydrological models to impacts, with a particular focus on groundwater aspects from a number of coordinated studies in Denmark. Our results are similar to those from surface water studies showing that climate model uncertainty dominates the results for projections of climate change impacts on streamflow and groundwater heads. However, we found uncertainties related to geological conceptualization and hydrological model discretization to be dominant for projections of well field capture zones, while the climate model uncertainty here is of minor importance. How to reduce the uncertainties on climate change impact projections related to groundwater is discussed, with an emphasis on the potential for reducing climate model biases through the use of fully coupled climate–hydrology models. Editor D. Koutsoyiannis; Associate editor not assigned
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2312-2324 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Hydrological Sciences Journal |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- climate change
- coupled climate–hydrology model
- groundwater
- hydrological change
- uncertainty cascade
- DK-model
Programme Area
- Programme Area 2: Water Resources
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Climate change impacts on groundwater hydrology - where are the main uncertainties and can they be reduced?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver