Abstract
This paper assesses how various sources of uncertainty propagate through the uncertainty cascade from emission scenarios through climate models and hydrological models to impacts, with a particular focus on groundwater aspects from a number of coordinated studies in Denmark. Our results are similar to those from surface water studies showing that climate model uncertainty dominates the results for projections of climate change impacts on streamflow and groundwater heads. However, we found uncertainties related to geological conceptualization and hydrological model discretization to be dominant for projections of well field capture zones, while the climate model uncertainty here is of minor importance. How to reduce the uncertainties on climate change impact projections related to groundwater is discussed, with an emphasis on the potential for reducing climate model biases through the use of fully coupled climate–hydrology models. Editor D. Koutsoyiannis; Associate editor not assigned
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2312-2324 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Hydrological Sciences Journal |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 13 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Oct 2016 |
Keywords
- climate change
- coupled climate–hydrology model
- groundwater
- hydrological change
- uncertainty cascade
- DK-model
Programme Area
- Programme Area 2: Water Resources