Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Choosing between Gaussian and MPS simulation: the role of data information content—a case study using uncertain interpretation data points

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Integration of geophysical data with information such as from boreholes and expert domain knowledge is often performed as cognitive or explicit geological modeling when generating deterministic geological models of the subsurface. However, such cognitive geological models lack the ability to express the uncertainty of layer boundaries. To remedy the shortcomings of this strategy we propose a novel stochastic methodology combining the efforts of probabilistic data integration and cognitive modeling. We treat geological interpretation points from the cognitive model as uncertain “soft” data. These data are then combined with analogous geology in a probabilistic model. We test two ways of combining and sampling from such a probabilistic model. Firstly, a high-entropy setup based on Gaussian distributions simulation. Secondly, lower entropy (and conceivable more realistic) geological solutions are obtained from multiple-point geostatistics (MPS). We apply both ways of solving the problem at a study site near Horsens, Denmark, where airborne transient electromagnetic measurements, seismic data, and borehole information are available and interpreted in cognitive modeling. We explain the complete framework for integrating the uncertain interpretations in geostatistical simulation. Results show that both the Gaussian simulation and multiple-point geostatistical approach allows satisfactory simulations of uncertain geological interpretations and are consistent with prior geological knowledge. Our results suggest that the number of uncertain data points and their information content play a pivotal role in selecting the most appropriate simulation method for the given framework. MPS simulations allow connectivity in scenarios with few data points due to the low entropy of the model. When the number of soft data increases, Gaussian simulation is less prone to produce simulation artifacts, faster to apply, and could be considered preferential to using MPS simulation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1563-1583
    Number of pages21
    JournalStochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
    Volume35
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

    Keywords

    • Gaussian simulation
    • Geostatistics
    • MPS simulation
    • Simulation method selection
    • Uncertain continuous data

    Programme Area

    • Programme Area 2: Water Resources

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing between Gaussian and MPS simulation: the role of data information content—a case study using uncertain interpretation data points'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this