Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Accuracy assessment of the MODIS 16-day albedo product for snow: Comparisons with Greenland in situ measurements

  • Julienne Stroeve
  • , Jason E. Box
  • , Feng Gao
  • , Shunlin Liang
  • , Anne Nolin
  • , Crystal Schaaf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

244 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) 16-day albedo product (MOD43) is assessed using ground-based albedo observations from automatic weather stations (AWS) over spatially homogeneous snow and semihomogeneous ice-covered surfaces on the Greenland ice sheet. Data from 16 AWS locations, spanning the years 2000-2003, were used for this assessment. In situ reflected shortwave data were corrected for a systematic positive spectral sensitivity bias of between 0.01 and 0.09 on a site-by-site basis using precise optical black radiometer data. Results indicate that the MOD43 albedo product retrieves snow albedo with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of ±0.07 as compared to the station measurements, which have ±0.035 RMSE uncertainty. If we eliminate all satellite retrievals that rely on the backup algorithm and consider only the highest quality results from the primary bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) algorithm, the MODIS albedo RMSE is ±0.04, slightly larger than the in situ measurement uncertainty. There is general agreement between MODIS and in situ observations for albedo <0.7, while near the upper limit, a -0.05 MODIS albedo bias is evident from the scatter of the 16-site composite.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-60
Number of pages15
JournalRemote Sensing of Environment
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Greenland
  • MODIS
  • Snow

Programme Area

  • Programme Area 5: Nature and Climate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy assessment of the MODIS 16-day albedo product for snow: Comparisons with Greenland in situ measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this