A global measure for depth of investigation

Anders Vest Christiansen, Esben Auken

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    211 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We tested a new robust concept for the calculation of depth of investigation (DOI) that is valid for any 1D electromagnetic (EM) geophysical model. A good estimate of DOI is crucial when building geologic and hydrological models from EM data sets because the validity of the models varies strongly with data noise and the resistivity of the layers themselves. For diffusive methods, such as ground-based and airborne electromagnetic, it is not possible to define an unambiguous depth below which there is no information on the resistivity structure and a measure of DOI is therefore to what depth the model can be considered reliable. The method we presented is based on the actual model output from the inversion process and we used the actual system response, contrary to assuming, e.g., planar waves over a homogeneous half-space, the widely used skin depth calculation. Equally important, the data noise and the number of data points are integrated into the calculation. Our methodology is based on a recalculated sensitivity (Jacobian) matrix of the final model and thus it can be used on any model type for which a sensitivity matrix can be calculated. Unlike other sensitivity matrix methods, we defined a global and absolute threshold value contrary to defining a relative (such as 5%), sensitivity limit. The threshold value will apply to all 1D inverted data and will thus produce comparable numbers of DOI.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)WB171-WB177
    Number of pages7
    JournalGeophysics
    Volume77
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

    Keywords

    • Airborne survey
    • Electromagnetics
    • Resistivity

    Programme Area

    • Programme Area 2: Water Resources

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A global measure for depth of investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this