TY - JOUR
T1 - The Scandinavian mountains have not persisted since the Caledonian orogeny. A comment on Nielsen et al. (2009a)
AU - Chalmers, J.A.
AU - Green, P.
AU - Japsen, P.
AU - Rasmussen, E.S.
PY - 2010/8
Y1 - 2010/8
N2 - Nielsen et al. (2009a) suggested that the high mountains of southern Scandinavia are the result of protracted exhumation since the Silurian. The evidence cited by Nielsen et al. (2009a) in support of this hypothesis is, however, very selective and other published evidence shows that their hypothesis is untenable. We suggest that an objective review of available evidence shows that the mountains of Norway are the result of uplift resulting from Cenozoic tectonism amplified by the isostatic response to resulting erosion, similar to many other continental margins around the world.
AB - Nielsen et al. (2009a) suggested that the high mountains of southern Scandinavia are the result of protracted exhumation since the Silurian. The evidence cited by Nielsen et al. (2009a) in support of this hypothesis is, however, very selective and other published evidence shows that their hypothesis is untenable. We suggest that an objective review of available evidence shows that the mountains of Norway are the result of uplift resulting from Cenozoic tectonism amplified by the isostatic response to resulting erosion, similar to many other continental margins around the world.
KW - Climate
KW - Elevated passive continental margins
KW - Falsification of hypotheses
KW - Isostasy
KW - Neogene uplift
KW - Scandinavian mountains
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955579325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jog.2010.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jog.2010.02.001
M3 - Comment/debate
SN - 0264-3707
VL - 50
SP - 94
EP - 101
JO - Journal of Geodynamics
JF - Journal of Geodynamics
IS - 2
ER -