TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing of different disintegration methods for micropalaeontological analyses
AU - Edvardsen, Trine
AU - Rasmussen, Jan Audun
AU - Stemmerik, Lars
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Three different preparation methods have been tested in order to determine the most suitable for disintegration of chalk for micropalaeontological analysis. Several factors have been examined, including the extent of disintegration, time consumed, state of foraminiferal preservation, and diversity of foraminifera. For the sediments used in this study, we find that a combination of the modified Glauber's salt and detergent methods are the most successful, while the acid-hot water method may be better suited for extraction of larger fossils. The study shows that not only is the preservation influenced by the chosen preparation method but also environmental indices such as the planktic to benthic ratio.
AB - Three different preparation methods have been tested in order to determine the most suitable for disintegration of chalk for micropalaeontological analysis. Several factors have been examined, including the extent of disintegration, time consumed, state of foraminiferal preservation, and diversity of foraminifera. For the sediments used in this study, we find that a combination of the modified Glauber's salt and detergent methods are the most successful, while the acid-hot water method may be better suited for extraction of larger fossils. The study shows that not only is the preservation influenced by the chosen preparation method but also environmental indices such as the planktic to benthic ratio.
KW - Chalk
KW - Foraminifera extraction
KW - Planktic to benthic ratio
KW - Preparation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060467210&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.marmicro.2019.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.marmicro.2019.01.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060467210
SN - 0377-8398
VL - 147
SP - 12
EP - 15
JO - Marine Micropaleontology
JF - Marine Micropaleontology
ER -