TY - JOUR
T1 - Observational and predictive uncertainties for multiple variables in a spatially distributed hydrological model
AU - Ehlers, Lennart Benjamin
AU - Sonnenborg, Torben Obel
AU - Refsgaard, Jens Christian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2019/2/28
Y1 - 2019/2/28
N2 - In this study, uncertainty in model input data (precipitation) and parameters is propagated through a physically based, spatially distributed hydrological model based on the MIKE SHE code. Precipitation uncertainty is accounted for using an ensemble of daily rainfall fields that incorporate four different sources of uncertainty, whereas parameter uncertainty is considered using Latin hypercube sampling. Model predictive uncertainty is assessed for multiple simulated hydrological variables (discharge, groundwater head, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture). Utilizing an extensive set of observational data, effective observational uncertainties for each hydrological variable are assessed. Considering not only model predictive uncertainty but also effective observational uncertainty leads to a notable increase in the number of instances, for which model simulation and observations are in good agreement (e.g., 47% vs. 91% for discharge and 0% vs. 98% for soil moisture). Effective observational uncertainty is in several cases larger than model predictive uncertainty. We conclude that the use of precipitation uncertainty with a realistic spatio-temporal correlation structure, analyses of multiple variables with different spatial support, and the consideration of observational uncertainty are crucial for adequately evaluating the performance of physically based, spatially distributed hydrological models.
AB - In this study, uncertainty in model input data (precipitation) and parameters is propagated through a physically based, spatially distributed hydrological model based on the MIKE SHE code. Precipitation uncertainty is accounted for using an ensemble of daily rainfall fields that incorporate four different sources of uncertainty, whereas parameter uncertainty is considered using Latin hypercube sampling. Model predictive uncertainty is assessed for multiple simulated hydrological variables (discharge, groundwater head, evapotranspiration, and soil moisture). Utilizing an extensive set of observational data, effective observational uncertainties for each hydrological variable are assessed. Considering not only model predictive uncertainty but also effective observational uncertainty leads to a notable increase in the number of instances, for which model simulation and observations are in good agreement (e.g., 47% vs. 91% for discharge and 0% vs. 98% for soil moisture). Effective observational uncertainty is in several cases larger than model predictive uncertainty. We conclude that the use of precipitation uncertainty with a realistic spatio-temporal correlation structure, analyses of multiple variables with different spatial support, and the consideration of observational uncertainty are crucial for adequately evaluating the performance of physically based, spatially distributed hydrological models.
KW - distributed hydrological model
KW - effective observational uncertainty
KW - forward uncertainty analysis
KW - multivariate uncertainty assessment
KW - parameter uncertainty
KW - precipitation uncertainty with realistic spatio-temporal correlation
KW - DK-model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060338275&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/hyp.13367
DO - 10.1002/hyp.13367
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060338275
SN - 0885-6087
VL - 33
SP - 833
EP - 848
JO - Hydrological Processes
JF - Hydrological Processes
IS - 5
ER -