Modeling denitrification: Can we report what we don't know?

  • B. Grosz
  • , A. Matson
  • , K. Butterbach-Bahl
  • , T. Clough
  • , E. A. Davidson
  • , R. Dechow
  • , S. DelGrosso
  • , E. Diamantopoulos
  • , P. Dörsch
  • , E. Haas
  • , H. He
  • , C.V. Henri
  • , D. Hui
  • , K. Kleineidam
  • , D. Kraus
  • , M. Kuhnert
  • , J. Léonard
  • , C. Müller
  • , S.O. Petersen
  • , D. Sihi
  • I. Vogeler, R. Well, J. Yeluripati, J. Zhang, C. Scheer

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debat

9 Citationer (Scopus)

Resumé

Biogeochemical models simulate soil nitrogen (N) turnover and are often used to assess N losses through denitrification. Though models simulate a complete N budget, often only a subset of N pools/fluxes (i.e., N2O, (Formula presented.), NH3, NOx) are published since the full budget cannot be validated with measured data. Field studies rarely include full N balances, especially N2 fluxes, which are difficult to quantify. Limiting publication of modeling results based on available field data represents a missed opportunity to improve the understanding of modeled processes. We propose that the modeler community support publication of all simulated N pools and processes in future studies.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere2023AV000990
Antal sider7
TidsskriftAGU Advances
Vol/bind4
Udgave nummer6
DOI
StatusUdgivet - dec. 2023

Programområde

  • Programområde 2: Vandressourcer

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Modeling denitrification: Can we report what we don't know?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater