TY - CHAP
T1 - Marine influence in Amazonia
T2 - Evidence from the geological record
AU - Hovikoski, Jussi
AU - Wesselingh, Frank P.
AU - Räsänen, Matti
AU - Gingras, M.
AU - Vonhof, Hubert B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/7/1
Y1 - 2010/7/1
N2 - Marine influence in Amazonia during the Miocene is a controversial issue, one about which nearly opposite theories (continental vs marine) have been proposed. Increasing multidisciplinary palaeoenvironmental data sets from various Miocene stratigraphic levels and parts of Amazonia have revealed depositional complexities triggered by repeated, high-frequency base-level changes and a very low depositional gradient. As a result, Early-Middle Miocene strata (Pebas phase) are organized into recurring 3-10 m-thick transgressive-regressive bay-margin successions. An array of evidence indicates some sort of marine influence in these deposits. This evidence includes mangrove pollen, foraminifers, rare brackish-water mollusc species, barnacles, common brackish-water trace fossil assemblages and tidal sediments. The ongoing debate now focuses on the degree of saltwater influence in the Pebas phase strata. The Late Miocene (Acre phase) stratigraphic record comprises mainly channelized deposits, and fossil faunas are dominated by terrestrial and freshwater vertebrates. The evidence for marginal marine influence in these strata is mainly confined to inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS)-bearing channels and includes tidal sediments, restricted brackish-water ichnofossil assemblages, and locally teeth of euryhaline sharks and mangrove pollen (Nauta and Madre de Dios Formations). In particular, the tidal signature in these deposits is well developed, pointing to local development of deltaic/estuarine settings. There are also suggestions of marine influence on other stratigraphic intervals throughout Amazonia, particularly in Pliocene and Quaternary strata. The allegedly marine conditions have been proposed based on purported global sea-level highstands, the low altitude of the Amazon region and supposed coastal geomorphological features such as deltas. We conclude that these suggestions are misconceptions and that geological data to support such marine settings during the Late Neogene are lacking.
AB - Marine influence in Amazonia during the Miocene is a controversial issue, one about which nearly opposite theories (continental vs marine) have been proposed. Increasing multidisciplinary palaeoenvironmental data sets from various Miocene stratigraphic levels and parts of Amazonia have revealed depositional complexities triggered by repeated, high-frequency base-level changes and a very low depositional gradient. As a result, Early-Middle Miocene strata (Pebas phase) are organized into recurring 3-10 m-thick transgressive-regressive bay-margin successions. An array of evidence indicates some sort of marine influence in these deposits. This evidence includes mangrove pollen, foraminifers, rare brackish-water mollusc species, barnacles, common brackish-water trace fossil assemblages and tidal sediments. The ongoing debate now focuses on the degree of saltwater influence in the Pebas phase strata. The Late Miocene (Acre phase) stratigraphic record comprises mainly channelized deposits, and fossil faunas are dominated by terrestrial and freshwater vertebrates. The evidence for marginal marine influence in these strata is mainly confined to inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS)-bearing channels and includes tidal sediments, restricted brackish-water ichnofossil assemblages, and locally teeth of euryhaline sharks and mangrove pollen (Nauta and Madre de Dios Formations). In particular, the tidal signature in these deposits is well developed, pointing to local development of deltaic/estuarine settings. There are also suggestions of marine influence on other stratigraphic intervals throughout Amazonia, particularly in Pliocene and Quaternary strata. The allegedly marine conditions have been proposed based on purported global sea-level highstands, the low altitude of the Amazon region and supposed coastal geomorphological features such as deltas. We conclude that these suggestions are misconceptions and that geological data to support such marine settings during the Late Neogene are lacking.
KW - Eustasy and geomorphology
KW - Ichnological indications for marine influence
KW - Invertebrate palaeosalinity indicators
KW - Isotope geochemical methods assessing palaeosalinities
KW - Marine influence in Amazonia - evidence from geological record
KW - Marine influence in Amazonia in Miocene - controversial issues
KW - Marine influence in Miocene western and western-central Amazonia
KW - Sedimentological indications of marine influence
KW - Tectonic subsidence of Andean foreland in Middle-Late Miocene - auto- and allocyclically driven shifts in depositional settings
KW - Tidal cycle ideal superimposition - in semi-diurnal, coastal depositional settings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987698456&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/9781444306408.ch9
DO - 10.1002/9781444306408.ch9
M3 - Chapter in book
SN - 978-1-405-18113-6
SP - 143
EP - 161
BT - Amazonia: landscape and species evolution
A2 - Hoorn, C.
A2 - Wesselingh, F.P.
PB - Wiley
ER -