TY - JOUR
T1 - Formation of macroscopic surface layers on Fe(0) electrocoagulation electrodes during an extended field trial of arsenic treatment
AU - van Genuchten, Case M.
AU - Bandaru, Siva R.S.
AU - Surorova, Elena
AU - Amrose, Susan E.
AU - Gadgil, Ashok J.
AU - Peña, Jasquelin
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the following researchers for their technical assistance and/or advice along the various stages of this work: Leon Alexander Geernaert, Thierry Adatte, Jean-Claude Lavanchy, Joyashree Roy, Francesco Femi Marafatto, Amit Dutta, Anupam DebSarkar, and Caroline Delaire. The authors are thankful to Prof. Cécile Hebert for providing access to the microscopes and interpretation software at the Centre Interdisciplinaire de Microscopie Electronique (CIME) of EPFL. This work was supported in part by The Sandoz Family Foundation , The BCV Foundation , The Blum Center for Developing Economies , a USEPA P3 Phase II award , The Sustainable Products and Solutions Program at UC Berkeley, Rudd Chair funds to Prof. Gadgil, the Marin-San Francisco Jewish Teen Foundation , the Development Impact Lab (USAID Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA-A-13-00002 ), part of the USAID Higher Education Solutions Network , and the US-India Science and Technology Endowment Fund.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Extended field trials to remove arsenic (As) via Fe(0) electrocoagulation (EC) have demonstrated consistent As removal from groundwater to concentrations below 10 μg L-1. However, the coulombic performance of long-term EC field operation is lower than that of laboratory-based systems. Although EC electrodes used over prolonged periods show distinct passivation layers, which have been linked to decreased treatment efficiency, the spatial distribution and mineralogy of such surface layers have not been investigated. In this work, we combine wet chemical measurements with sub-micron-scale chemical maps and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) to determine the chemical composition and mineral phase of surface layers formed during long-term Fe(0) EC treatment. We analyzed Fe(0) EC electrodes used for 3.5 months of daily treatment of As-contaminated groundwater in rural West Bengal, India. We found that the several mm thick layer that formed on cathodes and anodes consisted of primarily magnetite, with minor fractions of goethite. Spatially-resolved SAED patterns also revealed small quantities of CaCO3, Mn oxides, and SiO2, the source of which was the groundwater electrolyte. We propose that the formation of the surface layer contributes to decreased treatment performance by preventing the migration of EC-generated Fe(II) to the bulk electrolyte, where As removal occurs. The trapped Fe(II) subsequently increases the surface layer size at the expense of treatment efficiency. Based on these findings, we discuss several simple and affordable methods to prevent the efficiency loss due to the surface layer, including alternating polarity cycles and cleaning the Fe(0) surface mechanically or via electrolyte scouring.
AB - Extended field trials to remove arsenic (As) via Fe(0) electrocoagulation (EC) have demonstrated consistent As removal from groundwater to concentrations below 10 μg L-1. However, the coulombic performance of long-term EC field operation is lower than that of laboratory-based systems. Although EC electrodes used over prolonged periods show distinct passivation layers, which have been linked to decreased treatment efficiency, the spatial distribution and mineralogy of such surface layers have not been investigated. In this work, we combine wet chemical measurements with sub-micron-scale chemical maps and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) to determine the chemical composition and mineral phase of surface layers formed during long-term Fe(0) EC treatment. We analyzed Fe(0) EC electrodes used for 3.5 months of daily treatment of As-contaminated groundwater in rural West Bengal, India. We found that the several mm thick layer that formed on cathodes and anodes consisted of primarily magnetite, with minor fractions of goethite. Spatially-resolved SAED patterns also revealed small quantities of CaCO3, Mn oxides, and SiO2, the source of which was the groundwater electrolyte. We propose that the formation of the surface layer contributes to decreased treatment performance by preventing the migration of EC-generated Fe(II) to the bulk electrolyte, where As removal occurs. The trapped Fe(II) subsequently increases the surface layer size at the expense of treatment efficiency. Based on these findings, we discuss several simple and affordable methods to prevent the efficiency loss due to the surface layer, including alternating polarity cycles and cleaning the Fe(0) surface mechanically or via electrolyte scouring.
KW - Arsenic remediation
KW - Electrode surface layer mineralogy
KW - Fe(0) corrosion
KW - Fe(0) electrocoagulation
KW - Sustainable water treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961801009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.027
DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 27018519
AN - SCOPUS:84961801009
SN - 0045-6535
VL - 153
SP - 270
EP - 279
JO - Chemosphere
JF - Chemosphere
ER -