Environmental hot spots and resistance-associated application practices for azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, Denmark, 2020–2023

Maiken Cavling Arendrup, Rasmus Krøger Hare, Karin Meinike Jørgensen, Ulla E. Bollmann, Tina B. Bech, Cecilie Cetti Hansen, Thies M. Heick, Lise Nistrup Jørgensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftArtikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAf) fungi have been found inconsistently in the environment in Denmark since 2010. During 2018–2020, nationwide surveillance of clinical A. fumigatus fungi reported environmental TR34/L98H or TR46/Y121F/T289A resistance mutations in 3.6% of isolates, prompting environmental sampling for ARAf and azole fungicides and investigation for selection of ARAf in field and microcosmos experiments. ARAf was ubiquitous (20% of 366 samples; 16% TR34/L98H- and 4% TR46/Y121F/T289A-related mechanisms), constituting 4.2% of 4,538 A. fumigatus isolates. The highest proportions were in flower- and compost-related samples but were not correlated with azole-fungicide application concentrations. Genotyping showed clustering of tandem repeat–related ARAf and overlaps with clinical isolates in Denmark. A. fumigatus fungi grew poorly in the field experiment with no postapplication change in ARAf proportions. However, in microcosmos experiments, a sustained complete (tebuconazole) or partial (prothioconazole) inhibition against wild-type A. fumigatus but not ARAf indicated that, under some conditions, azole fungicides may favor growth of ARAf in soil.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Sider (fra-til)1531-1541
Antal sider11
TidsskriftEmerging Infectious Diseases
Vol/bind30
Udgave nummer8
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2024

Programområde

  • Programområde 5: Natur og klima

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Environmental hot spots and resistance-associated application practices for azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, Denmark, 2020–2023'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater