TY - JOUR
T1 - Drivers and barriers for taking account of geological uncertainty in decision making for groundwater protection
AU - Bjerre, Elisa
AU - Kristensen, Lone Søderkvist
AU - Engesgaard, Peter
AU - Højberg, Anker Lajer
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been carried out under the WaterProtect research project supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No. 727450 . Thanks to Erling Andersen for organizing the workshops, and to Josephine Larsen and Cæcilie Nedergaard for contributing to the geophysical MEP investigation. Thanks to Jens Peter Støjberg for granting access to his fields. We thank the editorial board as well as Ty Ferré and one anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - The geological conceptual model is considered a major source of uncertainty in groundwater modelling and well capture zone delineation. However, how to account for it in groundwater policy and management remains largely unresolved. We explore the drivers and barriers to account for geological conceptual uncertainty in groundwater protection amongst decision makers and stakeholders in an agricultural groundwater catchment in Denmark. Using a groundwater model, we analyze the impact of alternative geological conceptual models on capture zone delineation. A focus area, which covers multiple modelled capture zones, is defined and considered for groundwater protection. Model uncertainty and focus area are discussed at two workshops, one with local and national stakeholders and another with local farmers. The drivers to account for model uncertainty include: i) safer drinking water protection by considering a larger area for protection than identified from a single geological model; and ii) stability over time of management plans. The main barrier is the additional cost to the stakeholders for the protection of a larger area. We conclude that integration of geological uncertainty in groundwater protection plans may be improved through: i) better communication between the research community and the national water authority; ii) more constraining guidelines regarding the estimation of geological uncertainty; and iii) the development of a framework ensuring knowledge transfer to the local water authorities and detailing how to integrate uncertainty in management plans.
AB - The geological conceptual model is considered a major source of uncertainty in groundwater modelling and well capture zone delineation. However, how to account for it in groundwater policy and management remains largely unresolved. We explore the drivers and barriers to account for geological conceptual uncertainty in groundwater protection amongst decision makers and stakeholders in an agricultural groundwater catchment in Denmark. Using a groundwater model, we analyze the impact of alternative geological conceptual models on capture zone delineation. A focus area, which covers multiple modelled capture zones, is defined and considered for groundwater protection. Model uncertainty and focus area are discussed at two workshops, one with local and national stakeholders and another with local farmers. The drivers to account for model uncertainty include: i) safer drinking water protection by considering a larger area for protection than identified from a single geological model; and ii) stability over time of management plans. The main barrier is the additional cost to the stakeholders for the protection of a larger area. We conclude that integration of geological uncertainty in groundwater protection plans may be improved through: i) better communication between the research community and the national water authority; ii) more constraining guidelines regarding the estimation of geological uncertainty; and iii) the development of a framework ensuring knowledge transfer to the local water authorities and detailing how to integrate uncertainty in management plans.
KW - Conceptual uncertainty
KW - Consensus approach
KW - Multi-model approach
KW - Nitrate pollution
KW - Stakeholder involvement
KW - Well capture zone delineation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088914366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141045
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141045
M3 - Article
C2 - 32758986
AN - SCOPUS:85088914366
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 746
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 141045
ER -