TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrasting distributions of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) in speleothems and associated soils
AU - Blyth, Alison J.
AU - Jex, Catherine N.
AU - Baker, Andy
AU - Khan, Stuart J.
AU - Schouten, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by ARC Discovery Project DP110102124 (A.B., S.K., A.J.B. and C.J.) and an AINSE Research Fellowship to A.J.B., who also acknowledges a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship in support of the speleothem analyses. S.S. thanks The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) for financial support through a VICI grant. J. Ossebaar, E. Hopmans and A. Mets (NIOZ) are thanked for assistance. J. MacDonald of the University of Newcastle, NSW supplied WM-4 and assisted in soil sample collection, A. Hartland, then of the University of Birmingham, supplied PE-1. A. Walker, general manager of Poole’s Cavern, is thanked for assistance with soil sample collection and site access. Speleothem samples LBM-S2 and LBM-S3 were supplied by D. Dominguez-Villar, while J. Dredge of the University of Birmingham assisted with soil sample collection. The support of Wellington Council is acknowledged for access and sampling at Wellington Caves. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments.
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) preserved in speleothems can form useful records of terrestrial palaeotemperature. However, understanding of the sources of these compounds in caves is limited, particularly whether or not they should be considered as an in situ signal derived from microbial communities in the cave or vadose zone, a transported soil signal, or a mixture of the two. We have analysed speleothem samples and related soils from five cave sites and demonstrate that clear differences were apparent between soils and speleothems in GDGT distributions. Speleothems were primarily, but not uniformly, dominated by crenarchaeol, reflected in the branched and isoprenoid tetraether (BIT) index values, and had a lower relative abundance of the crenarchaeol regioisomer than soils. The most distinct differences were in the bacterially derived branched GDGTs, where no relationship was seen between speleothems and soils for the cyclisation of branched tetraethers (CBT) index, with speleothems in four out of five caves showing a greater degree of cyclisation in GDGT structures than could be explained by measured pH values. Differences in speleothem GDGT composition between sites were also seen. We suggest that the speleothem GDGT record is distinct from the GDGT distribution produced in soils, and is primarily derived from in situ microbial communities within the cave or vadose zone. Variation within these communities or in the cave microenvironment also acts to produce site-specific differences.
AB - Glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) preserved in speleothems can form useful records of terrestrial palaeotemperature. However, understanding of the sources of these compounds in caves is limited, particularly whether or not they should be considered as an in situ signal derived from microbial communities in the cave or vadose zone, a transported soil signal, or a mixture of the two. We have analysed speleothem samples and related soils from five cave sites and demonstrate that clear differences were apparent between soils and speleothems in GDGT distributions. Speleothems were primarily, but not uniformly, dominated by crenarchaeol, reflected in the branched and isoprenoid tetraether (BIT) index values, and had a lower relative abundance of the crenarchaeol regioisomer than soils. The most distinct differences were in the bacterially derived branched GDGTs, where no relationship was seen between speleothems and soils for the cyclisation of branched tetraethers (CBT) index, with speleothems in four out of five caves showing a greater degree of cyclisation in GDGT structures than could be explained by measured pH values. Differences in speleothem GDGT composition between sites were also seen. We suggest that the speleothem GDGT record is distinct from the GDGT distribution produced in soils, and is primarily derived from in situ microbial communities within the cave or vadose zone. Variation within these communities or in the cave microenvironment also acts to produce site-specific differences.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894304266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.01.013
DO - 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.01.013
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84894304266
SN - 0146-6380
VL - 69
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Organic Geochemistry
JF - Organic Geochemistry
ER -