TY - JOUR
T1 - A drone-borne method to jointly estimate discharge and Manning's roughness of natural streams
AU - Bandini, Filippo
AU - Lüthi, Beat
AU - Peña-Haro, Salvador
AU - Borst, Chris
AU - Liu, Jun
AU - Karagkiolidou, Sofia
AU - Hu, Xiao
AU - Lemaire, Grégory Guillaume
AU - Bjerg, Poul L.
AU - Bauer-Gottwein, Peter
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded within the RIVERSCAPES project by the Innovation Fund Denmark under file number 7048‐00001B. The authors acknowledge Filip Floks, Jens S. Sørensen and Ursula S. McKnight, respectively student, technician and associate professor at DTU Environment, for their support during planning and conducting field campaign. Furthermore, we thank Jørn K. Pedersen and Lone Dissing from Region Syddanmark together with Paul Landsfeldt from Vejle Kommune for supporting the field operations and providing additional funding.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Image cross-correlation techniques, such as particle image velocimetry (PIV), can estimate water surface velocity (v surf) of streams. However, discharge estimation requires water depth and the depth-averaged vertical velocity (U m). The variability of the ratio U m/v surf introduces large errors in discharge estimates. We demonstrate a method to estimate v surf from Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) with PIV technique. This method does not require any ground control point (GCP): the conversion of velocities from pixels per frame into length per time is performed by informing a camera pinhole model; the range from the pinhole to the water surface is measured by the drone-borne radar. For approximately uniform flow, U m is a function of the Gauckler-Manning-Strickler coefficient (K s) and v surf. We implement an approach that can be used to jointly estimate K s and discharge by informing a system of two unknowns (K s and discharge) and two nonlinear equations: i) Manning's equation and ii) mean-section method for computing discharge from U m. This approach relies on bathymetry, acquired in situ a priori, and on UAS-borne v surf and water surface slope measurements. Our joint (discharge and K s) estimation approach is an alternative to the widely used approach that relies on estimating U m as 0.85·v surf. It was extensively investigated in 27 case studies, in different streams with different hydraulic conditions. Discharge estimated with the joint estimation approach showed a mean absolute error of 19.1% compared to in situ discharge measurements. K s estimates showed a mean absolute error of 3 m1/3/s compared to in situ measurements.
AB - Image cross-correlation techniques, such as particle image velocimetry (PIV), can estimate water surface velocity (v surf) of streams. However, discharge estimation requires water depth and the depth-averaged vertical velocity (U m). The variability of the ratio U m/v surf introduces large errors in discharge estimates. We demonstrate a method to estimate v surf from Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) with PIV technique. This method does not require any ground control point (GCP): the conversion of velocities from pixels per frame into length per time is performed by informing a camera pinhole model; the range from the pinhole to the water surface is measured by the drone-borne radar. For approximately uniform flow, U m is a function of the Gauckler-Manning-Strickler coefficient (K s) and v surf. We implement an approach that can be used to jointly estimate K s and discharge by informing a system of two unknowns (K s and discharge) and two nonlinear equations: i) Manning's equation and ii) mean-section method for computing discharge from U m. This approach relies on bathymetry, acquired in situ a priori, and on UAS-borne v surf and water surface slope measurements. Our joint (discharge and K s) estimation approach is an alternative to the widely used approach that relies on estimating U m as 0.85·v surf. It was extensively investigated in 27 case studies, in different streams with different hydraulic conditions. Discharge estimated with the joint estimation approach showed a mean absolute error of 19.1% compared to in situ discharge measurements. K s estimates showed a mean absolute error of 3 m1/3/s compared to in situ measurements.
KW - discharge
KW - drones
KW - PIV
KW - roughness
KW - surface velocity
KW - uniform flow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101511792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2020WR028266
DO - 10.1029/2020WR028266
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85101511792
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 57
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 2
M1 - e2020WR028266
ER -